Father of Set Theory (and Infinity Infinities) Part 2
Last time we talked about how Cantor began exploring infinities by saying they could behave like integers in the fact that they could be added together and that one infinity could be larger than another infinity. He applied rules of a one-to-one basis on numbers to show that the sets of infinity were the same sizes of the infinite sets in the fact they had the same number of elements. Cantor realized that this could not be applied to decimal numbers which included irrational numbers. He had to think of several clever arguments in order to prove this, one of them being the “diagonal argument.” This argument proved that it was always possible to construct a new decimal number that was missing from the original list and thus makes decimal numbers infinite in nature, even more infinite than natural numbers. The diagonal argument is as follows and corresponds to the picture above: Imagine an infinite set of numbers made up of an infinite pattern of just two digits (the example ...